Talk:FundCamp PurposeProcessPlatform
From P2PVenture.org's Wiki
| Revision as of 08:46, 21 September 2007 (edit) FredericBaud (Talk | contribs) m ← Previous diff |
Revision as of 13:38, 21 September 2007 (edit) (undo) SamRose (Talk | contribs) (Ok about Due Dilligence, although I do know of people who would like to experiment with collab decision making) Next diff → |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| Hi Sam, just started to edit the article. We'll have to spend more time to really get more into it, but that's a first shot to get the ball rolling. -- [[User:FredericBaud|FredericBaud]] 04:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | Hi Sam, just started to edit the article. We'll have to spend more time to really get more into it, but that's a first shot to get the ball rolling. -- [[User:FredericBaud|FredericBaud]] 04:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ''Note:'' I think we should not call (ConsensusPolling and Predictionmarkets) the "Jury process". I believe only the investors should be in charge of the Jury and are responsable to allocate the funds they committed. Open processes could be used to evaluate the different projects, but they should not be used to make the actual decision. -- [[User:FredericBaud|FredericBaud]] 08:11, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Agreed, although, I know of some people, who are interested in being investors, who would like to try an experiment where they would be a component in the actual decision-makign process. But maybe this idea is possibly for the future, and too complex to integrate into this platform at this time. So, we'll definitely keep those processes as Due Dilligence, just as you describe. --[[User:SamRose|SamRose]] 09:38, 21 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 13:38, 21 September 2007
Please do edit the article as much as you see fit, add to, re-arrange, clarify. I think I have a pretty good idea about how to put this together fairly quickly, but want to make sure I get all of the components to match what we need and are looking for --SamRose 13:40, 20 September 2007 (EDT)
Hi Sam, just started to edit the article. We'll have to spend more time to really get more into it, but that's a first shot to get the ball rolling. -- FredericBaud 04:46, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Note: I think we should not call (ConsensusPolling and Predictionmarkets) the "Jury process". I believe only the investors should be in charge of the Jury and are responsable to allocate the funds they committed. Open processes could be used to evaluate the different projects, but they should not be used to make the actual decision. -- FredericBaud 08:11, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
Agreed, although, I know of some people, who are interested in being investors, who would like to try an experiment where they would be a component in the actual decision-makign process. But maybe this idea is possibly for the future, and too complex to integrate into this platform at this time. So, we'll definitely keep those processes as Due Dilligence, just as you describe. --SamRose 09:38, 21 September 2007 (EDT)
