P2PVenture.org's Wiki talk:Community Portal

From P2PVenture.org's Wiki

Revision as of 18:43, 16 September 2007 (edit) FredericBaud (Talk | contribs) m ← Previous diff		Revision as of 15:53, 17 September 2007 (edit) (undo) SamRose (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	I'm not sure I see the pros and cons of the different choices. Could we create a summary table with Pros and Cons columns where we would list the different choices of licenses. -- [[User:FredericBaud|FredericBaud]] 14:43, 16 September 2007 (EDT)		I'm not sure I see the pros and cons of the different choices. Could we create a summary table with Pros and Cons columns where we would list the different choices of licenses. -- [[User:FredericBaud|FredericBaud]] 14:43, 16 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	{|class="wikitable"
		+	|-
		+	|+ Open Licenses: Pros and Cons
		+	|-
		+	|| License || CC || By Attribution || Share-Alike || Non-Commerical Use || Gnu Freedoc License || GnuFreedoc dual with CC BY SA ||
		+	|-
		+	|Pros
		+	|-
		+	|Cons
		+	|}

---

Revision as of 15:53, 17 September 2007

Shall we continue to operate with CC BY SA license? I think we can also "Dual-license" to make conent compatible with GnFreedoc (so that it's compatible with Wikipedia, etc), similar to what http://aboutus.org has done: http://www.aboutus.org/AboutUs:Copyrights

Personally, I think we should address this for all content on all public sites, soon. That way there is no potential issue with newcomers down the road. --SamRose 13:13, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

I'm not sure I see the pros and cons of the different choices. Could we create a summary table with Pros and Cons columns where we would list the different choices of licenses. -- FredericBaud 14:43, 16 September 2007 (EDT)

Open Licenses: Pros and Cons

License	CC	By Attribution	Share-Alike	Non-Commerical Use	Gnu Freedoc License	GnuFreedoc dual with CC BY SA
Pros
Cons